RubiStar |
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar (
http://rubistar.4teachers.org ) >> To save this document
onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As from your
Browser Menu. |
|
CATEGORY |
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Call letters, frequency, program, etc.
|
Identification of call letters, frequency,
program name, host, guest(s), and date and time of broadcast.
|
One criterion missing. |
Two criterion missing. |
Three or more criterion missing. |
Type of program |
Complete and proper identification of program
type. |
Identification of program type with a slight
error. |
Partial identification of program type.
|
Errors with identification of program type.
|
Topics discussed |
A complete and comprehensive explanation of
topics discussed. |
A correct identification of topics discussed.
|
More than one error, omission or
misidentification of information. |
More than two errors, omission or
misidentification of information. |
Production elements |
Identification and explanation of several
production elements is complete and comprehensive. |
A correct identification of several production
elements. |
More than one error, omission, misidentification
of information or lack of explanation. |
More than two errors, omission, misidentification
of information or lack of explanation. |
Accompanying website |
A few sentences accurately provides information
found on the accompanying website; including web address. |
A correct identification of information found on
the accompanying website; including web address. |
More than one error, omission, or
misidentification of information. |
More than two errors, omission, or
misidentification of information. |
Underwiting |
Identification of several examples is
comprehensive and accurate. |
Identification of several examples is accurate.
|
More than one error, omission, or
misidentification of information. |
More than two errors, omission, or
misidentification of information. |
blank |
|
|
|
|
Impressions of show |
Opinion provided; comprehensive discussion of
what you liked and did not like. |
Opinion provided; identification of what you
liked and did not like. |
Opinion provided but lacks explanations of what
you liked and did not like. |
Not a clear or concise discussion of your
opinion; lacks explanation. |
Future listening |
Opinion provided; comprehensive discussion with
specific examples of why you will or will not listen to the show.
|
Opinion provided; discussion with specific
examples of why you will or will not listen to the show. |
Opinion provided; but lacks concrete discussion
with specific examples of why you will or will not listen to the show.
|
Opinion provided; lacks specific examples of why
you will or will not listen to the show. |
Class Participation |
Active listening is comprehensive with notes from
at least three other student presentations. |
Active listening is demonstrated with notes from
at least two other student presentations. |
Active listening is demonstrated with notes from
at least one other student presentation. |
Notes are lacking details from at least one other
student presentation. |
Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC |